Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Investors - LC / Re: Is LC no longer interested in retail investors?
« Last post by investny on October 15, 2018, 11:28:43 PM »
I noticed that starting October 1 the number of LC loans that match my filters dropped by 80-90%. At first i thought that this happened because LC pulled most loans into end of September to hit their Q3 numbers. But its been 2 weeks and the volume did not pick up.
2
General P2P Lending Discussion / Re: I discovered an elegant way to put a running daily XIRR in an Excel column.
« Last post by charchles on October 15, 2018, 05:15:47 PM »
Tony - do you still have the image from the original post?
3
General P2P Lending Discussion / New P2B lending platform Debitum Network
« Last post by Algio on October 15, 2018, 02:35:37 PM »
Hi,
new p2B lending platform Debitum Network launched last month. Just wanted to introduce to some basic info about the platform.

At any given time there are about 30 assets to invest.
Annual interest rates are within the range of 10-15%.
Industries that dominate are: Logistics, Manufacturing, Wholesale and Services.
Maturity terms from a few weeks to half a year.
Guarantee. Typically: invoices, personal (from owners), company (another company issues a guarantee).
Loan amounts vary from 4000 to 50 000 Euros.
Amounts for investment are flexible (10 Eur is the minimum).
Portfolio types: conservative, moderate, aggressive.

Disclosure: I work for Debitum Network.
4
Investors - LC / Re: Requesting a quick survey on P2P lending
« Last post by .Ryan. on October 14, 2018, 11:56:00 PM »
Quote from: Fred93 on October 13, 2018, 01:38:50 PM
I think the purpose is email address harvesting.

Agreed. Combine the personal data gleaned from the survey (personal income, age, investment preferences, etc) with the contact information you give (e-mail address), that data can be sold for good money.
5
Investors - LC / Re: Requesting a quick survey on P2P lending
« Last post by rawraw on October 14, 2018, 05:18:36 PM »
To be fair, Qualtrics is not cheap and is heavily used in academia.  So possible it is a professor?
6
Investors - LC / Re: Requesting a quick survey on P2P lending
« Last post by Fred93 on October 13, 2018, 01:38:50 PM »
Quote from: Joe6Luck on October 13, 2018, 05:18:11 AM
From the survey questions, looks you are working on cryptocurrency, instead of p2p lending. I think people like me would appreciate if you could share a bit more details about the purpose of this survey.

I think the purpose is email address harvesting.

I find "anonymous" and "supposedly university professor" survey takers, especially ones who ask such dumb questions, to be fundamentally suspect.  (and I'm trying very hard to be kind as I choose those words)
7
Investors - LC / Re: Requesting a quick survey on P2P lending
« Last post by Joe6Luck on October 13, 2018, 05:18:11 AM »
Quote from: cshhm1 on October 10, 2018, 11:59:29 PM
I am an university professor who are studying P2P lending market.
For my research team's study, could you please participate a quick survey on your P2P lending experience?


From the survey questions, looks you are working on cryptocurrency, instead of p2p lending. I think people like me would appreciate if you could share a bit more details about the purpose of this survey.
8
Foliofn - LC / Re: Orders API doesn't return orders IN_LISTING
« Last post by martinp2p on October 11, 2018, 05:18:53 PM »
Hi Mark,

I also got the doc on new API from LC support. I didn't know it existed, but they just threw me the doc to answer my question about the old API. [LOL]

The new APIs provide a lot more functionality, but seems still being baked. Probably that's why it's not public yet.
9
Foliofn - LC / Re: Orders API doesn't return orders IN_LISTING
« Last post by mark78 on October 11, 2018, 04:54:01 PM »
Your link is to the "old" API. The "new" API documentation is not online as far as I know, but you can request it from LC support. The name of the "new" API documentation is "Lending Club Secondary Market APIs Documentation".

How did you test this and see the same behavior, without the new documentation- just from my snippet?
10
Foliofn - LC / Re: Folio API note selling
« Last post by martinp2p on October 11, 2018, 12:14:47 PM »
Hi Ran,

The old API worked for me (after some trial and error). Here is sample code in C#:

        const string investorId = "12345678";
        const string authKey = @"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";

        string baseAddress = string.Format("https://api.lendingclub.com/api/investor/v1/accounts/{0}/", investorId);
        HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
        client.BaseAddress = new Uri(baseAddress);
        var result = client.DefaultRequestHeaders.TryAddWithoutValidation("Authorization", authKey);

        HttpRequestMessage request = new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Post, "trades/sell");
        request.Content = new StringContent(sellRequestBodyJson, Encoding.UTF8, "application/json");
        HttpResponseMessage response = await client.SendAsync(request);

        if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
        {
            string jsonResult = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();

        }

Hope this helps!

Quote from: Ran on March 07, 2018, 09:14:07 PM
Anyone successfully used the latest Folio Notes API to post notes for sell?
The API document said you may POST to url https://api.lendingclub.com/api/investor/v1/secondarymarket/accounts/ACCOUNTID/orders
with JSON content like [{"noteId":"NOTEID","price":25.00, "orderType":"SELL","expirationDate":"2018-03-14"}].
I tried but only get 400 bad request which means my JSON content is rejected. Now I am wondering whether that API document simply contains error.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10