I've found a lot of 40X/U IR scores among very high-income but otherwise really sketchy loans...
Well, are you saying that rich people should have the same expenses you have? And that very high income isn't a useful variable?
Wow, you're reading quite a bit into my statement that wasn't there! I'm saying that I've found a lot of high IR01/unknown IR04 scores among high-income but otherwise really sketchy loans. No more and no less. I made no comment or judgment on "rich people" or whether or not it's a useful variable. Clearly it is, or I wouldn't use income in most of my filters.
But if you have an F or G loan with multiple recent delinquencies, a huge amount of debt, major derogatories, 3 or more inquiries, etc. but they have a high income... it surprises me that it would get a 408 or 409 score because that's literally as high as you can get in that ranking system, and it seems like there must be better loans out there. I mean, obviously if they have major derogatories and recent delinquencies their high income is not cutting the mustard for them. (Or maybe they are lying about the income?)
But, hey, I'm not a statistician! What do I know. You can buy up all those notes if you like them
Edit: Adding some examples of the loans I'm referring to... these are all 409/U with 5-6% expected loss. Maybe that's right, but it seems crazy to me.
http://www.lendingclub.com/account/loanDetail.action?loan_id=5938548 ($100k income, 4 delinquencies, major derog)
http://www.lendingclub.com/account/loanDetail.action?loan_id=5844991 ($120k income, 4 inquiries, 99.8% utilization)
http://www.lendingclub.com/account/loanDetail.action?loan_id=5446235 ($150k income, 5 inquiries, delinquency/major derog, 1 year employment... although bonus points for working pest control in a town called "Locust Grove," no wonder he makes a lot of money!)
http://www.lendingclub.com/account/loanDetail.action?loan_id=5694641 ($250k income, 4 delinquencies, major derog, 95.8% utilization, $90k revolving credit - and he's borrowing this for home improvement, not to reduce debt!)